Date
E-Filed |
# |
Document Information |
Filing Party |
End  |
| 03/28/13 |
501 |
Wall, Daniel: Reply Brief: Oracle's Reply to HP's Opposition to Oracle's Special Motion to Strike Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 03/28/13 |
502 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: REDACTED Declaration of Brittany Lovejoy in Support of Oracle's Reply to HP's Opposition to Oracle's Special Motion to Strike Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. Attached: (1) "Exhibit 1." (2) "Exhibits 2 through 4." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 03/29/13 |
503 |
Pfeiffer, Alfred: Memorandum: BRIEF REGARDING USE OF THE COURT'S PHASE ONE STATEMENT OF DECISION DURING PHASE TWO PROCEEDINGS. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 03/29/13 |
504 |
Pfeiffer, Alfred: Declaration: DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER CAMPBELL IN SUPPORT OF ORACLE CORPORATION'S BRIEF REGARDING USE OF THE COURT'S PHASE ONE STATEMENT OF DECISION DURING PHASE TWO PROCEEDINGS. Attached: (1) "Exhibits 1 through 4." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 03/29/13 |
505 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Statement: Joint Final Pre-Trial Conference Statement For Phase 2 Trial. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A - Joint Preliminary Witness List." (2) "Exhibit B - Plaintiff And Cross-Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company's Preliminary Trial Exhibit List (Phase II)." (3) "Exhibit C - Oracle Corporation's 3/18/13 Preliminary Phase 2 Trial Exhibit List." (4) "Exhibit D - HP's Proposed Neutral Statement Of The Case (HP v. Oracle, No. 1-11-CV-203163)." (5) "Exhibit E - HP v. Oracle: Phase 2 Proposed Statement Of The Case." |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 03/29/13 |
506 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Other: Hewlett-Packard Company's Proposed List Of Factual Findings From Phase 1 To Be Deemed Established In Phase 2 Of The Trial. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/02/13 |
507 |
Samel, Charles: Notice: Motion to Seal: Nonparty Intel Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Seal Records Pursuant to Rules 2.550 and 2.551 of the California Rules of Court. |
Intel Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
508 |
Samel, Charles: [Proposed] Order: Proposed order (Cover Sheet). Attached: (1) "[Proposed] Order Sealing Documents." (2) "[Proposed] Order Sealing Documents - Word format." |
Intel Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
509 |
Samel, Charles: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Patrick Buddenbaum in Support of Intel Corporation's Motion to Seal. |
Intel Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
510 |
Samel, Charles: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Robert Deline in Support of Intel Corporation's Motion to Seal. |
Intel Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
511 |
Samel, Charles: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Andy Robbins in Support of Intel Corporation's Motion to Seal. |
Intel Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
512 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Notice of Appearance: Notice of Appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Hewlett-Packard Compan. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/02/13 |
513 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Reply: PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S SUR-REPLY TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 425.16. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A." |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/02/13 |
514 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Response: PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S RESPONSE TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S BRIEF REGARDING PHASE I FINDINGS. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/02/13 |
515 |
Wall, Daniel: Application and Order: Appear Pro Hac Vice: Notice and Unopposed Verified Application of David Boies to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Oracle Corporation. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
516 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Daniel M. Wall in Suppot of Unopposed Verified Application of David Boies to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
517 |
Wall, Daniel: [Proposed] Order: [Proposed] Order Permitting David Boies to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice. Attached: (1) "[Proposed] Order (PDF Version)." (2) "[Proposed] Order (MSWord Version)." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
518 |
Wall, Daniel: Application and Order: Appear Pro Hac Vice: Notice and Unopposed Verified Application of Alan B. Vickery to Appear as Counsel Pro Hac Vice for Defendant and Cross-Complainant Oracle Corporation. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
519 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Daniel M. Wall in Support of Unopposed Verified Application of Alan B. Vickery to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
520 |
Wall, Daniel: [Proposed] Order: [Proposed] Order Permitting Alan B. Vickery to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attached: (1) "[Proposed] Order (PDF Version)." (2) "[Proposed] Order (MSWord Version)." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/02/13 |
521 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Order Granting Alan B. Vickery's Pro Hac Vice Application. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/02/13 |
522 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Order Granting David Boies' Pro Hac Vice Application. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/03/13 |
523 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Other: Minute Order from April 2, 2013. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/03/13 |
524 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Order on Oracle Corporation's February 21, 2013 Motion to Reopen Discovery. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/03/13 |
525 |
Wall, Daniel: Response: Oracle's Response to HP's Sur-Reply regarding Oracle's Motion to Strike Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.6. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/04/13 |
526 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Clerk's Notice: Tentative Ruling for April 5, 2013. |
Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
526 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Motion In Limine: PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT RELATING TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S LITIGATION AGAINST SAP AG AND LEO APOTHEKER'S ALLEGED INVOLVEMENT IN THE CONDUCT GIVING RISE TO THAT LITIGATION. |
|
|
| 04/05/13 |
530 |
Wall, Daniel: Objection...: Oracle Corporation's Objection to and Request to Strike Hewlett Packard Company's Improper Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Relating to Oracle Corporation's Litigation Against SAP AG and Leo Apotheker's Alleged Involvement in the Conduct Giving Rise to that Litigation. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
531 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Sadik Huseny in Support of Oracle Corporation's Objection to and Request to Strike Hewlett Packard Company's Improper Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence and Argument Relating to Oracle Corporation's Litigation Against SAP AG and Leo Apotheker's Alleged Involvement in the Conduct Giving Rise to that Litigation. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
532 |
Wall, Daniel: Motion In Limine: Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Argument and Evidence of Lost Profits that Fail to Disaggregate Lost Profits Arising from Oracle's Plan to Appeal. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
533 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: REDACTED Declaration of Andrew Gass in Support of Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Argument and Evidence of Lost Profits that Fail to Disaggregate Lost Profits Arising from Oracle's Plan to Appeal. Attached: (1) "Exhibits 1 through 6." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
534 |
Wall, Daniel: Request: Judicial Notice: Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Argument and Evidence of Lost Profits that Fail to Disaggregate Lost Profits Arising from Oracle's Plan to Appeal. Attached: (1) "Exhibit 1." (2) "Exhibit 2." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
535 |
Wall, Daniel: Motion In Limine: Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Argument and Evidence of Lost Profits that Fail to Disaggregate Lost Profits Related to Oracle's "E-Business Suite". |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
536 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: Declaration of Sadik Huseny in Support of Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Argument and Evidence of Lost Profits that Fail to Disaggregate Lost Profits Related to Oracle's "E-Business Suite". Attached: (1) "Exhibit 1." (2) "Exhibits 2 and 3." (3) "Exhibit 4." (4) "Exhibit 5." (5) "Exhibit 6." (6) "Exhibit 7." (7) "Exhibit 8." (8) "Exhibit 9." (9) "Exhibit 10." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
537 |
Wall, Daniel: Motion In Limine: REDACTED Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Out-of-Court Customer Statements Offered by HP Fact or Expert Witnesses. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
538 |
Wall, Daniel: Declaration in Support: REDACTED Declaration of Perry M. Grossman in Support of Oracle Corporation's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Out-of-Court Customer Statements Offered by HP Fact or Expert Witnesses. Attached: (1) "Exhibits A through I." |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
539 |
Wall, Daniel: Proof of Service: Proof of Service of Documents Filed Under Seal under Oracle Corporation's Motions in Limine. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/05/13 |
540 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Opposition: PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF LOST PROFITS THAT FAIL TO DISAGGREGATE LOST PROFITS ARISING FROM ORACLE'S PLAN TO APPEAL. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
541 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Declaration: DECLARATION OF ALEXANDER M. FENNER IN SUPPORT OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF LOST PROFITS THAT FAIL TO DISAGGREGATE LOST PROFITS ARISING FROM ORACLE?S PLAN TO APPEAL. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
542 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Opposition: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND EVIDENCE OF LOST PROFITS THAT FAIL TO DISAGGREATE LOST PROFITS RELATED TO ORACLE'S E-BUSINESS SUITE. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
543 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Declaration: DECLARATION OF DHANANJAY S. MANTHRIPRAGADA IN SUPPORT OF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ARGUMENT AND EVIDENCE OF LOST PROFITS THAT FAIL TO DISAGGREATE LOST PROFITS RELATED TO ORACLE'S E-BUSINESS SUITE. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A." (2) "Exhibit B." |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
544 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Opposition: [REDACTED] HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF OUT-OF-COURT CUSTOMER STATEMENTS OFFERED BY HP FACT OR EXPERT WITNESSES. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
545 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Declaration: [REDACTED] DECLARATION OF JARED M. STRUMWASSER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF AND CROSS-DEFENDANT HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OPPOSITION TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF OUT-OF-COURT CUSTOMER STATEMENTS OFFERED BY HP FACT OR EXPERT WITNESSES. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
546 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Objection...: PLAINTIFF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OBJECTIONS TO ORACLE'S SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND SUPPORT FOR HP'S SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING THE LANHAM ACT. Attached: (1) "Exhibit A." (2) "Exhibit B." |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
547 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Objection...: PLAINTIFF HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S OBJECTIONS TO ORACLE CORPORATION'S SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING HP'S CLAIMS FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT AND BREACH OF THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING. Attached: (1) "EXHIBIT A." |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/05/13 |
548 |
Srinivasan, Jay: Other: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY'S REVISED PROPOSED LIST OF FACTUAL FINDINGS FROM PHASE 1 TO BE DEEMED ESTABLISHED IN PHASE 2 OF THE TRIAL. |
Hewlett-Packard Company |
|
| 04/08/13 |
549 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Order re Oracle's Special Motion to Strike Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/08/13 |
550 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Order Continuing Trial. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/08/13 |
551 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Other: Minute Order from April 5, 2013. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/08/13 |
553 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: AMENDED Order re Oracle's Special Motion to Strike Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.16. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/08/13 |
554 |
Wall, Daniel: Notice of Appeal, Unlimited: Defendant and Cross-Complainant Oracle Corporation's Notice of Appeal. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/08/13 |
555 |
Wall, Daniel: Notice of Appeal, no Fee: Defendant and Cross-Complainant Oracle Corporation's Notice of Appeal. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 04/09/13 |
556 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Pre-Trial Order No. 1 [Phase Two of Trial, After Conference on April 2, 2013). |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/09/13 |
557 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Order - for Court's Use Only: Order Vacating Trial Date and Setting Status Conference. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| 04/18/13 |
558 |
Wall, Daniel: Designation of Transcript on Appeal: Appellant Oracle Corporation's Notice Designating Record on Appeal. |
Oracle Corporation |
|
| 05/08/13 |
559 |
Kleinberg, James P.: Notice: Continued Case Management Conference: CMC reset from May 10, 2013 to June 14, 2013. |
Superior Court of California |
|
| [End of document list. Last document is #559.] |
 Top |
 |
[Documents restricted to registered case parties are NOT shown in this list.
You must log in to see the complete list.] |
Report date Sat. 5/18/13 8:48 AM
